Wednesday, October 18, 2017

Fake News / Hate News Mainstream Media Rant

Mainstream fake news / hate news media is completely hush-hush about THE REAL RUSSIA COLLUSION between democrats / socialists and Putin.

Millions of dollars funneled into The Clinton Foundation during Hilary's time as Secretary of State while Russia was getting diplomatic favors, which included Obamatard approving the sale of 20% of America's uranium.

That money that was going into The Clinton Foundation was suppose to be made public, but wasn't. Instead, it was covered-up.

The dirty democrats doing what they are accusing Trump of doing, of which zero evidence has yet to be presented.

I'm glad I'm no longer a tax payer, I would be pissed right now at the waste of money put into this democratic scam of Trump / Russia collusion delusion.

And now we have yet another waste of life, socialist congresswoman from Florida politicizing the death of a military hero. One of four hero's that were recently killed in an ambush. Democrats are indeed disgusting, and just as I said once in a blog post, the democrat party is America's ISIS.

They are as soulless as soulless can be. The democrats deserve Hollywood, and Hollywood deserves the democrats. Filth supporting filth. Everything the democrats touch turns to shit. The economy, the education system, Hollywood, music industry, and now, the NFL.

They are the biggest liars I have ever known. They endorse sexual assault, pedophilia, and make sure they keep the black community jobless, uneducated, and dependent on that government cheese.

I have yet to meet a democrat that could even come close to matching the I.Q. of a fat mans wet fart.

Sunday, September 24, 2017

Take The Knee For Socialism

Anyone who knows me knows that I served in two military branches in my younger days. I was in the U.S. Army Reserve, and then I went active in the U.S. Navy. I did so because I wanted to preserve freedom for all American citizens. (But not for illegals, just saying).

Anyhow, I also served to preserve the freedom so that stupid people can do stupid things. Which brings us to the latest socialist craze, Taking The Knee. (Or TTK)

TTK started a year ago when the black Tim Tebow, known as Colin Kaepernick, a then quarterback for the San Fransisco 49'ers, took a knee before the game during the playing of our national anthem. He did so just to gain national attention because he sucks at playing quarterback, hence, he is still currently unemployed by the NFL, but he will tell you he did it to bring attention to a social injustice of cops killing black criminals. (The most recent outrage was in St. Louis, Missouri, when in 2011, a cop killed a drug dealer who tried to run over cops with his car while running from an arrest for selling drugs.) I want to make it perfectly clear where I stand, I don't care what color you are, if you sell drugs, then I wish your ass to be dead. I support cops killing all drug dealers across my great nation. I hate drug dealers, rapists, pedophiles, and women / children beaters. All of these people should be shot and killed. Including murderers. (Let's not forget them).

Anyhow, Colin Kaepernick started this TTK crap for attention. He is a fake and a fraud, and I will tell you why. When the moment came for him to make a REAL difference and vote for REAL change, he didn't vote. That told me right there that he was just doing what he was doing for the attention. It also told me he was a fake and a fraud. (The facts speak for themselves).

But now, all across the NFL, and after President Trump spoke out against TTK, the democrats and anti-Trump people decided to use it to show support for socialism. I say this because the only people who are TTKing, are the democrats, and we all know they are the socialist party of America. (They are also the ISIS of America).

That and also, and this is the part I like the best, the socialist liberals / democrats are totally, and completely slapping Colin Kaepernick right in the damn face.

I LOVE IT!!!!!! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaha

Colin Kaepernick did not kneel for any injustice, and he certainly did not kneel to protest President Trump, so for the idiots who are now TTKing, they are / have destroyed whatever cause Colin Keapernick thought he was kneeling for. The damn socialists got their dirty hands on his "cause" and turned it into Taking The Knee For Socialism.

Again, I love it, and I support this 100%. lol I honestly do support the freedom of the stupid to do stupid things. And you can't get anymore stupid than Taking The Knee For Socialism.

And that's exactly what you are doing when you Take The Knee. (By the way, I do not support socialism, but I support your right and freedom to Take The Knee For Socialism).

Stupid socialists. lol   

 

Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Motherless.com Features Child-Porn

Remember these people? They are Motherless.com, a porno site. I did a post about them a while back and how they practice banning people for posting child porn when in reality, many of them don't. (Motherless Post Click Here)


Well, I think I might know why they go after the people they go after. You see, they promote themselves as a "free" site, people can join and surf their site for free however, they do offer a a "premium membership" that you can pay and get more options or something.

When I wrote my post on them, I discussed how they seem to ban non-paying members for "questionable" material. A friend of mine set up an account and posted mostly non-nude material of 18+ year old girls. He got banned for posting "child porn" when in fact, he never did post anything close to being child porn. But he was not a paying member so he was expendable. And many non-paying members get banned for apparently no reason but are told it's for posting child porn. One guy I talked to said he never even posted anything and was banned for posting child porn. (You figure that one out.)

But while non paying members keep getting banned, apparently it's okay to post child porn material if you are a premium member. I have discovered some very questionable pictures of under-aged girls displaying their breasts. Now when you see the photo's, you will not actually see the nudity because I refuse to display under-aged girls / child porn on this blog. However, if authorities contact me and request the links to those pictures, I will be happy to oblige them. Now, on to the first picture.


 As you can see, I stopped the snapshot just short of showing you this girls breast. Clearly she appears to be around 13, 14, or perhaps 15 years old. If you saw her breast, that is clearly exposed, all you would see is a very small nub and her nipple. Her body, as well as her chest, looks very young. Just as young as her face.

The individual that posted this picture not only posted the other two pictures that I will be showing you, but he / she is a premium member, which means this person pays Motherless.com to be a member.

Obviously, Motherless.com would not want to ban this person because it means they would be losing money, so they instead turn their head the other way to this kind of behavior for premium members. But if you were to view the entire picture, you would clearly see it is obvious that this girl is under-age. Now to the next picture.


Again, I had to cut off the rest of this picture because I do not want to post child porn on this blog. But if you were to see the full picture, you would see small breasts and nipples, and in this case, the girl has turned her head away from the camera, indicating, in most incidents of under-age pictures, that the cameraman does not want people to know this is an under-aged girl.

Even if any of these girls I feature on this post were of age, the pictures themselves would be highly questionable. And remember, people who do not pay Motherless.com get banned all the time for "questionable" photo's and or video's, but apparently, "questionable" posts by premium members are allowed. This appears to be the theme for Motherless.com. And perhaps there is a reason for it. Perhaps they do this to get Interpol (International Police) off their back. Perhaps they report the "non-paying" members they ban for child porn, even if they don't post child porn, just to make it look like they are cracking down on child porn posts when in fact, they allow their "premium" members to post child porn because, well, you know, they pay to be a member. You get the idea. Now to the third picture.


This girl (on the right) clearly looks to be around 14 or 15 years old. Had I posted the complete picture, you would be able to see her breast in clear view. This girls body even looks like a youthful teenager. But the individual that posted it, and the other two photo's I showed you, is a "premium" member so again, if you're a paying member of Motherless.com, you are allowed to post (mild?) child porn pictures.

I know that if a high-school took these pictures, and or sent these pictures out to his friends, he would surely be arrested for engaging in child porn activity. 

I will continue to look through the many tens of thousands of members on Motherless.com to try and find more evidence of child porn posts. I could have posted several more pictures like the ones you see here, but they all were showing only their breasts. I'm looking for harder child porn material on their site to expose. I will have to keep digging as what I have uncovered to this point is all from one primary member. I don't want to expose who this member is because I am still going through more of "their" posts. They are a very active member. And who knows, they might even post some new material that I can use as evidence. But again, if the authorities reach out to me, I will supply them with the name of this poster and a link to his or her membership page. I also know that if I were to expose this individual, Motherless.com would probably delete their profile and thus, delete the evidence.

I will stay on top of this, and post any further stories relating to this situation as I discover more members that are posting child porn material, and getting away with it because they are "premium" members. In the meantime, shame on Motherless.com for allowing this to happen. For shame indeed.



UPDATE 09/26/2017 

Okay, so another picture was found of a girl that clearly appears to be somewhere around 13, 14, or 15 years old. The dirty part has been blacked out.